Showing posts with label favorites. Show all posts
Showing posts with label favorites. Show all posts

Friday, November 20, 2009

Friday Favorite: Remembering some good ole 1980's Schlock!

0 Contributions
As I wrote in the introductory passage of this entry, I wrote this the day Snakes on a Plane was released theatrically, and I've been once again revisiting the Schlock of my youth, and this entry captures a lot of those movies in one place.

--
With it being Snakes on a Plane Friday, I got a little wistful and began thinking about some of the wonderfully cheesy 1980's horror movies I saw as a kid, and I thought I would share a few of them with you.

Now I could mention movies like Tremors and Return of the Living Dead, but where would the fun be in that?

The first movie that I thought of when I started on this little odyssey to the era or Reagan was 1986's Night of the Creeps. Now, the recent Slither took a lot from this movie, but accept no substitutes. I mean, it has all the requisite elements for an 80's horror movie. College kids-Check, aliens-Check, Zombies-Check, a Serial Killer-Check, and yes, a sense of campy humor-Double check. The basic plot involves worm-like creatures that eat people's brains from the inside and it is all good, gory fun from there, and if you love the attitude of Bruce Campbell's Ash, you will really enjoy Tom Atkins take on the burnt-out cop Ray Cameron. (And did I mention that every main character in the movie is named after a horror director). Editorial Update: Night of the Creeps was recently released on DVD.

Now I could try to describe 1985's The Stuff to you, but I think the New York Times does it better than I ever could. I would describe it as 1 part The Blob, one part The Thing and one heaping spoonful of social satire. All in all, it is a frothy and sweet good time, and you will never look at Cool Whip the same again.

And I would be remiss if I didn't mention C.H.U.D., after all, you can't talk about the schlock without it, because C.H.U.D. is a glorious return to the B-movies of the 1950's. There is radiation in them there sewers and where you got radiation, you got blood-thirsty mutants, and of course, mutants got to feed above ground, and in this case, they have a choice buffet that includes Daniel Stern, John Heard, John Goodman, Jay Thomas and Kim Greist. It isn't a great film(though it is award winning), but it delivers some good jolts for bucks. The IMDB has it rated at 4.5/10, but it is better than that.

Of course, I am sure you, my readers, have a few more suggestions that could satiate someone's appetite for some cheap and messy thrills this weekend, so I open the floor to you all.

So, if you don't want to bear witness to the Rocky Horror Picture Show with snakes tonight or this weekend, you can still get your B Horror flick fix this weekend at your local video store or even perhaps from your On-Demand cable system. I am not guaranteeing you will like these movies, only that they bring back good memories for me.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Friday Favorite: A Goonies Sequel? I'll believe it when I see it

4 Contributions
Well, I was doing a little digging online about a potential sequel to The Goonies, and I remembered that I had written a post about that which is still relevant (for a few months anyway), and I thought it was worth revisiting.

--
There have been discussions about the whole Goonies gang getting back together to film a sequel to the iconic 1985 adventure movie for years, and speculation about the project has gotten some more fuel because Sean Astin has revealed that the sequel is an absolute certainty.

Of course, I'll believe it when I see it. And I am so sure that the project isn't getting off the ground that I am making this pledge to you, my readers.

If this movie is made before 2010, I will be forced to write nice and/or flattering things about the following:

The Four Horsewomen of the Cultural Apocalypse (Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Nicole Ritchie and Paris Hilton)
Scientology
The FCC
Uwe Boll
Fox News
Bill O'Reilly
Ann Coulter
and 6-8 additional figures/organizations to be determined by you all.

I would consider that putting my money where my mouth is so to speak. (And I just may keep that whole Four Horsewomen concept for the future).



--

I am prepared to up the ante on this come the new year. Stay tuned to this blog in January 2010 to see what new challenge I come up with regarding this.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Friday Favorite: Man, I Miss Zines

0 Contributions
It again has been one of those weeks, so I thought it would be a good time for another Friday Favorite column.

And those of you who remember previous trips back in the vault can probably surmise that this is yet another entry from the formative days of this blog... back in mid-2006.

Yes, I still miss zines and the zining phenomenon. I admit it.

--
Last night I was going through my box of zines and thinking about how much I missed that phenomenon. I know, a lot of people have said that blogging is the more accessible and more mainstream version of zining, but on many levels, it just isn't the same.

I miss looking through Zine World, MaximumRockAndRoll and Factsheet 5, looking for oddities and quality, substantive journalistic work.

I miss entering into that strange bond of trust with ziners that if you stuffed a buck or 5 into an envelope, that it would get there in one piece and you would be given a little piece of their mind in turn.

I miss the smell of xeroxed covers, each one showing a black and white image of an individual world, one that was unique to its writer and the dualities within.

Happy Not Stupid, Murder Can Be Fun, Temp Slave, McJob, Guinea Pig Zero and so many more either gone or very minimalized now. I wonder how many of their authors went on to create new works... how many Pagan Kennedy's emerged from those folded pages to become larger figures in the publishing or writing world, and were the mirror for the bloggers who are finding wider spread acceptance and book deals nowadays?

I think I guess being able to hold a copy of a unified work rather than an ever-changing array of opinions and articles. That and the fact that those who zined loved it so much that they did it at a loss and with a lot of effort, and I think my own failures in this department makes me admire those who were out there every day pushing their own little piece of the publishing pie. I mean, I would have loved to have brought out even one issue of History Is a Nightmare: A Neomodern Review, but alas, it wasn't to be.

I do have a lot of hope that blogging with continue the spirit of zining in an electronic body, but I still wish more people were still into zining. As a sidenote, I have to say that Gimme Your Stuff sort of reminds me of a few issues of Beer Frame, and I appreciate the good memories that site brings back for me and I thank them all for that.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Friday Favorite: Mouthwash for your musical soul

2 Contributions
I wrote this back in July 2006, and for the most part the items contained within still work well for me as antidotes for earworms.

However last October, I would be tormented by an unrelenting earworm, and most of the stuff on this list didn't do the trick, so your mileage may vary with these suggestions.

---

After my own post yesterday and the Fergie abomination that D. Prince posted last night, it made me remember advice that I've stated time and time again on blogs and chatrooms all over the internet.

When it comes to those awful songs that you can't get out of your head, you need to have a group of songs at your disposal that are a) catchy or really memorable and b) something you can live with. With me, I have a few songs that I can call upon to get rid of one of these nasty lingerers. In general, I employ a lot of TV theme songs because they are generally memorable, relatively short and after a few times around your head, they will eventually remind you of another tune and then they are cleansed from your mind too. You can get a lot of these songs online at places like The 80's TV Theme Supersite and TV Cream, so develop your own set of goto song erasers.

My set:

1) The Theme to the Wide World of Sports
2) The Oakland Raiders Theme(or anything else from the NFL Films collection). I suppose that the theme from Raiders of the Lost Ark would work similarly though.
3) The Equalizer/The Rockford Files/Sanford and Son/The Fall Guy/CHiPs

Though I've found these to work too:

4) Portland, Oregon by Loretta Lynn f/ Jack White
5) L'America by the Doors
6) Green Onions by Booker T and the MGs

Commercial jingles should not be used in these situations, as they were designed to stick in your mind, and you will be trading one problem for another.

In extreme cases, you can use one horrible song against another if it is slightly less likely to cause your brain to bleed. For example, after hearing Fergie's new single "London Bridge", I knew that my goto songs just couldn't defeat that beast. The theme songs are like Scope and Listerine, and I really needed something akin to kerosene or a flamethrower to burn that tune out of my head. So I had to turn to my old nemesis and one of the songs that made me develop my system in the first place, Gwen Stefani's "Hollaback Girl", and I can honestly say that I cannot remember "London Bridge" at all today.

However, Banana Phone or Badger Badger Badger is never the answer and should never be applied to your mind at anytime. That is why I haven't linked to them here either, because those are the equivalent of whipping out the nuclear weapons. Yes, whatever was floating around in your mind will be gone, but so will everything else, and that isn't the best of outcomes.

So hopefully, I have not only undone the damage that I did yesterday, but given you all the techniques to survive this age of appallingly catchy music.


Friday, July 17, 2009

Friday Favorite: Lessons I've Learned from the Movies

2 Contributions
I just keep finding entries that I had forgotten about, and without tooting my own horn, I have enjoyed rereading.

This one was a little strange, but really was in keeping with the vibe I was putting out in mid-2006. And it still works even today. I hope you enjoy it as well.

--

This is not one of those Movie Physics kind of things, or something that is questioning the logic of actions within the narratives of certain movies, but rather a more generalized list of just stuff that makes sense in real life as presented in the movies(though of course, to a much more pronounced sense in the movies).

In life, someone will betray you and you will not discover this until it is almost too late. In most cases this will not involve someone trying to kill you or destroy the world with a giant space laser, though it may involve your wife or husband and a best friend or boss.

When you are trying to change your life, someone may get you to commit to one last job... though it is probably just settling an account or doing a little design on the side rather than going deep undercover on a Russian nuclear submarine, stealing the world most cursed diamond or taking out the 5 men that will destroy your family if they are not stopped.

Someone will con you, though it will probably be out of a week's salary or a few bucks, and most likely won't be for a keycard that will get someone into the backroom of a casino or the nuclear football.

If you are the underdog, or your team is, they may win.... they probably won't, but it could happen... I mean, it isn't like they win at the end of everything, is it?

You will meet a person of the opposite sex in a amusing or provocative way... but this will usually not result in a long-term relationship or your involvement in an international drug deal in the next 3 hours.

Your plane may become involved in an incident where the pilot and/or copilots are all taken out for some strange reason... but you will likely not be asked to take the controls unless you've had some flight training.

You will get sick... though in all likelihood vomit will not spray out of your mouth like a garden hose full of creamed corn. Unless you mixed drinks and ate some raw meat... because then anything can happen.

You will get into a fight... but it probably won't be a total bar meltdown with people flying everywhere and pool cues getting broken over someone's head.

Most people know more about computers and how to circumnavigate problems than they let on... though most people couldn't hack into a nuclear war simulation or the NSA.

It is easy to fake insanity... or to hide it. It all depends on the circumstances really.

And in life, you too can have theme music... but you have to have a CD player, car stereo or Ipod.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Friday Favorite: Magazines- Parting is such sweet sorrow

1 Contributions
I was going to revisit this topic in a new post, but I decided to take a look at my original thoughts on the subject and realized that I had pretty much gotten what I wanted to say down the first time anyway. Thus it was republished as a Friday Favorite.

--

I admit it: I am a packrat when it comes to magazines. I mean, if I buy it, I am keeping it, bucking the trend that the average magazine gets discarded after roughly 29 weeks. Granted, I don't really buy news magazines so they do tend to age a little more gracefully, though my old copies of Wired and those pesky game magazines don't seem so fresh now, though I still wonder what ever happened to the N-Gage.

Looking through old magazines is indeed a window into the past in some odd ways... like when you look at the predictions of how certain things are going to fare. For example, whenever I see one of those articles about an upcoming television series today predicting which shows are going to make it and which ones are doomed, I think back to an October 2000 article in FHM that predicted that Cursed, Hype, The Queen of Swords, Andromeda, Sheena-Queen of the Jungle and Freedom would all have a long and happy life while series like Yes, Dear and C.S.I had questionable prospects for success. The fact that most of the shows I mentioned in the first part of that list would probably draw a 'Huh?' from most people makes my case I think. Or looking through some of my old Alternative Press magazines about the 100 artists you must hear this year and finding that even after years, I still haven't heard of most of the artists they are promoting really shows what a shotgun approach printed prognostication ends up being.

Or in hindsight, you can see all the hype that surrounded a movie that, in the end, is no longer really remembered for anything in particular. I mean, when was the last time you heard anyone talk about the Sweet and Lowdown or The Full Monty. In the end, this kind of backwards perusal of these past phenomenon allows for one to look at things in the long view, though that didn't help me with Snakes on a Plane unfortunately.

Perusing some back issues of some entertainment magazines also lets you see a group of people who will one day become more famous at a moment in time when they are just moving into the spotlight. I recall I have a particular issue of a magazine whose name escapes me that features Jaime Pressley, Kelly Hu, Jon Stewart and I believe Will Ferrell before they all started getting their act together(OK, saying that Hu on In Case of Emergency is getting her act together is stretching it) back in the late 1990's.

But the funniest trip back is still a few issues of "The 'Net" magazine from back in early 1996. This was back in the days when lower speed modems ruled the earth and the costs of net access where prohibitively expensive(if I used the internet then like I do now, my monthly bill would be somewhere in the range of 400 or more dollars.) It was a time when the JPG wasn't king, and when domain names weren't really being used, so almost every page on the internet was exceedingly long and featured at least one or two ~'s. It was a time when the prediction was that Flash/Shockwave would never really become a popular element online because it was so bandwidth intensive. Granted, they did cover Match.com about that time too, so maybe they weren't entirely without merit. I still remember text browsing, so reading about the early versions of this program called Internet Explorer that was about to hit its third version. I wonder whatever happened to it. Hmmm.

It wasn't until about 3 years ago that I finally got around to recycling a box of old video game and computer gaming magazines from the 1980's, and I wonder at what point it is going to feel right to get rid of those 3 boxes of magazines that I keep going to when I want a laugh or a quick vision of the past. Those old Writer's Digests have to be terribly out of date now too.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Friday Favorite: The Importance of History in Fiction: A personal commentary

0 Contributions
Who would have believed I was still as much of a cranky old man a few years as I am today?

--
I was a history major in university, and I am sure more than a few of my readers think the subject is quite frankly boring, but it is still something that fascinates me to this day.

And much like those experts in forensic science that wince when they watch CSI, the physicists who cringe when watching science fiction and the lawyers who shake their heads at every legal drama, I too recoil in horror when I encounter the lack of historical thinking that occurs in the work of a lot of science fiction/fantasy authors and filmmakers.

From most of the writing books I have ever read, one of the key points is usually always something akin to "know the world you are writing about", and from my viewing/reading habits, well, it seems like these creators just don't have that good of an understanding of the history of their settings and societies. They make elementary mistakes which are clear to someone who has studied the development of cultures, technologies and nations, mistakes which seriously put the rest of the premise they are trying to present under immense strain.

Usually when you are introduced to a character and a plot, well, the details behind how we got to this particular point are usually very sketchy. You may be presented with a few relevant bits and pieces from the immediate past(like the fact that a war has just taken place), but the steps the society took to get to that point are woefully inadequate to support the story, or what's worse, the causality of the events make absolutely no sense from a historical point of view, like in fantasy books, having almost every character be literate when they've grown up in a society that has no books. Or having a science fiction universe where every planet is one culture, language, religion and race, or in fantasy where a hero can go from one end of a continent to another and can converse with everyone in the same language without explaining that there may be a universal language that transcends the vernacular(like Latin amongst the educated classes in Europe for centuries). I know it is easier to write a story when you don't have to worry about those pesky little details like having to deal with a cosmopolitan society, but it makes me die a little inside every time I see it.

And when they show some of these places, it is like they just pulled that planet/city/empire out of a shrinkwrapped box and plopped it in there. Sure, the buildings may be burned out or falling apart, but when you look at the places they occupy, well, it is like someone just put them up yesterday, like it is some odd futuristic version of a Levittown. There is nothing organic about these places, they don't feel lived in. And in fantasy, there are castles, but you never read about the wars and interregional rivalries that caused them to be built.

There are also those allegorical tales that use certain Earth-based historical events, figures and nations as the basis of their societies (Nazi Germany/Soviet Russia were used quite a bit... ok, more than quite a bit really), but they usually don't explain how things got to that point. We are instead supposed to just take the artist's word that this is just how things are, and usually they are making these entreaties for is to believe them while presenting other information which completely invalidates that reality. Like having a huge, megalithic fascist regime that supposedly controls the lives of everyone, and yet, everyone has access to as much information as they could ever want or has easy access to the very systems would will eventually bring down the entire empire.

And the products of culture are rarely explored in these types of work. Sure, there may be some consumer products and the occasional work of scholarship in these created worlds, but there is a huge intellectual output that is created by a society that is rarely explored.

I mean, if you picked up a novel that was set in Northern Virginia, 1864, you have a good idea of the context in which the events of the book take place, just as you may if it was set in 1960's San Francisco/Saigon. And for exotic and unknown settings like 1540's Europe or 2nd century East Asia, you have other resources to discover this information, but when an author/director is building a world, you have to take their word for it and hope that we will follow them along for the ride. If someone was willfully ignorant of their setting in these cases, we wouldn't accept it. Why is it anymore acceptable when the world is being created from the ground up then?

I am not saying that I need to know the entire history of a world to get into a story, but there are a lot of times when I don't think the creators of these worlds could answer some basic questions about them either, and that is my point. I am not looking for them to make up the entire historical background for everything that ever happened on that world like Tolkien devised, but I do have a reasonable expectation that if asked, an author/director should be able to tell you about the conflicts between two groups of people or how a species reached the stars or united as one on a planet. Because really, how can we be expected to understand a character when the author doesn't fully understand them either?

Friday, May 29, 2009

Friday Favorite: The Wicker Man: Why I hate Hollywood

0 Contributions
Today, Aaron from Electronic Cerebrectomy made some observations on two lists of remakes James Gunn had blogged about, and one of those remakes just happened to be The Wicker Man, and it made me remember a post I had made right after I found out about that particular remake. For something I just started riffing on, I think I ended up being frighteningly accurate in my assessment.

--

I know, I know I'm not the first blogger(or professional journalist for that matter) to write disparagingly about the glut of remakes that have been coming out the last few years, but you know, it still needs to be said.

The basic jist of most of those articles is that in general remakes suck.... and they are right.

With that in mind, I want to just mention that I hate the fact that not one but TWO remakes of the Wicker Man are being made.

If you haven't seen The Wicker Man, it is a cool, atmospheric and on some level, utterly believable horror movie that had an ending which still chills me to this day. And after seeing what modern Hollywood did to Assault on Precinct 13, I am scared... no very, very scared of what is going to become of The Wicker Man in their *ahem* capable hands.

Edward Woodward was perfect for the lead in the original... I mean, this is the man who became the the Equalizer for the love of...-- does that mean nothing?!? I know that Nick Cage has... what's it called... oh yeah, "star power", but that isn't an excuse. Neil LaBute, what are you doing to us?

Some of you may be saying, well, MC, Neil Labute's made some decent movies in the past, so it won't be so bad. Well, the fact that the director of the original, when he heard about some of the changes being made to the original plot and structure of the movie for the remake, asked that his name be removed from all the promotional materials for the new film says a lot. And then he went further.

Robin Hardy decided he was going to reimagine The Wicker Man, using the same setting but creating a new story around it. Cowboys For Christ isn't really a sequel so much as it is a re-examination of the same themes. Of course, the way I see it is CoC is basically Hardy flipping off the whole remake.

You know something is off when many of the figures from the original movie start working on a competing project. I mean, how bad is the Labute version really going to be? I think one only has to look at the two competing Exorcist prequels to answer that question.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Friday Favorite: The Best Book on Writing I've Ever Read

3 Contributions
Because I am continuing to work on that television pilot, I have been thinking about the writing process as of late (and I am sure you have noticed that the contents of this blog as of late haven't been the choicest of cuts truth be told).

But even now, I still consult one book to understand the psychology of the process. This is a review of that title I wrote a few years ago.

-

In my life, I've read a lot of books on writing: books on form, books on plotting, books on grammar, books on genre etc. But there has always been one book that I go back to time and time again.

In the summer of 1997, I was at my favorite little independent bookstore(which was torn down a few years ago to put up a larger structure... a parking garage.), and I noticed this little brown and white paperback with a matte cover, and while I didn't know it at the time, it was going to become my faithful companion in the coming years.

The book was called The Courage To Write by Ralph Keyes, and what surprised me the most was the fact that it wasn't really concerned with the technical aspects of the writing process, rather it focused on the psychology of writing if you will.

I saw a lot of my own tendencies in the anecdotal evidence from the lives of other writers that Mr. Keyes provided. I was especially taken by the stories about E.B. White and Pat Conroy, because of their problems facing their fears and in Conroy's case, the reaction of those closest to him because of his writing. It was also the book that first introduced me to the term of "privishing", or writing that fearful authors create which they may be spectacularly good, but they are afraid to submit for publication, so they just distribute it amongst their friends and colleagues. I've known writers like that, and it breaks my heart to think that they may still be doing that, and as you read it, you will probably see yourself or others as well.

I know it is one thing for a writer to learn a new technique or exercise, but for a book to teach a writer, young or old, why they are the way they are, well, that's really something. The Courage to Write is one of those works that fundamentally changes one's worldview, and I was quite pleased to find out that it now has a companion volume called The Writer's Book of Hope, which I hope to pick up in the near future.

In short, I think it is a must-read for anyone who wants to be a professional writer. It is just that good.

Friday, May 08, 2009

Friday Favorite: 10 Things you Will Never Hear Me Say: Pop Culture Edition

1 Contributions
It just felt like a great time to repost this old Top Ten list (mainly because I was thinking about doing a second edition next week).

--

There is this little thing going around called "10 things you wouldn't hear me say", and I usually don't do these sorts of things, but I was reminded of a great bit by Zach Galifianakis regarding things you would never hear amongst his roommates in his apartment, and in all honesty, I can't get go by a good premise without biting(though hopefully not sucking). But I couldn't do it straight up... I had to make it mine, so in the spirit of my pop cultural mission, it is all Pop Culture.

So, here are things you will NEVER hear me say:

10. I need to know what Brangelina/Paris Hilton/Michael Jackson is doing right now! I'll just turn on CNN because I am sure they have a chopper over that person's house/up their skirt.
09. I can't wait for the next remake
08. I'm so excited. Uwe Boll is making another video game movie?
07. Oh My God... that new Britney Spears/Ja Rule duet is killer!
06. I long for the days of Seagal and Van Damme again.
05. More actors should write books of poetry
04. I think they should be more pretentious and arty when they talk about their work
03. It is ok that they ripped off 70 people in their book. I mean, look at them, they're gorgeous.
02. I think their should be more shows where a group of "professionals" come in and uproot someone's life to make a pointless change for them. I mean, who can live with clutter or unfashionable clothing. Let them make those people feel like crap, because they certainly deserve it for being so unhip.

And naturally:

01. A Seminar for Scientology! Where do I sign up?

So now the question becomes, would you say any of those things?


Friday, April 17, 2009

Friday Favorite: The Buyer's Remorse of a Music Lover

5 Contributions
I can't believe I am dragging this little bit of embarrassment up again. I was working on another post for next week, and I was reminded of this gem from November 2006. Perhaps it will generate some new admissions from people who weren't reading my blog back in 2006.

--

I think we all have those albums or songs in our music collections that you can't believe you bought or own {as sometimes you get music for other reasons).

Now I have two tragic faults when it comes to music... I can be swayed by price and I can't throw things away if they suck. So, here is just a few of the motley groaners amongst the hundreds of cds I own.

Jewel- Pieces of You: Yes, I own a Jewel CD *shame*. It was 5 bucks at a pawn shop, it was 1997, and I was a little young and naive... I know better now, but now the market is flooded with it, so I can't really get rid of it through commercial means, and I can't bear to just throw it out. It isn't bad, and I can honestly say I listened to it at most 3 times in the last 9 years, but seeing it on my shelf just doesn't give me any indie cred at all. In retrospect, it was perhaps one of the easiest things to pick on in my collection.

Alisha's Attic- Alisha Rules the World : Well, at least with this one I have an excuse. When I was in college I was an arts reviewer for the institution's paper and that was one of the CDs I had to review. The question is, why do I still have it. I mean, I should have gotten rid of it years ago. Now, in thinking of the album, I honestly couldn't remember a thing about it. I had to go to Youtube to actually refresh my memory about what the group sounded like. It was that long since I had experienced them.

The 20th Century Collection- The Best of ABBA: Now, no excuse can really justify this, though I will state that I had just gone through a breakup and "The Winner Takes it All" was a pretty accurate assessment of my feelings at the time. And it was 10 bucks at a drug store, so it was slightly cheaper than making homemade Prozac. But now... shudder. I can't believe I own it.

The entire Letters to Cleo discography
: Back in 1994, Letters to Cleo had a minor hit with the song Here and Now, and at the time, I got really into the band. Being the favorite band of the heroine of 10 Things I Hate About You was strike one, Kay Hanley was the stunt singer(I love that term though) for Rachael Leigh Cook in Josie and the Pussycats was strike 2. Then Generation O! was when they were out and I really started to question my earlier love for the band. There are still moments that I like them, but as I approach 30, I feel like I've grown up and past their work now. Sad but true.

Jan Hammer- Escape from Television: Buoyed by the success of Miami Vice, Jan Hammer, the man who wrote the music for that series decided to capitalize his newly-found fame and release an album of tracks from the series. While the tunes do work as incidental music for the show, as an album... it is brutal. Yes, the Miami Vice theme song and "Crockett's Theme" are quality stand alone pieces of music, but wow, as a whole it will burn your soul... and not in a good way. My only consolation is I bought it from a bin for 3 bucks at a boxing day sale, so at least I didn't burn my soul and my wallet at the same time.

So tell me, what cds do you own that you aren't too proud of. We're all friends here after all. I've shown you some of mine, now I want to see some of yours.

Friday, April 03, 2009

Friday Favorites: One good meal leads to another: Dinner for Five

0 Contributions
I was watching Team America: World Police last night on cable, and it somehow reminded me of this old gem. The updated information for this entry is that all the seasons are apparently available now, which is great news to me.

--

I was thinking about American Thanksgiving this morning, and somehow my mind was drawn to another eclectic seating of disparate guests for a fancy dinner.

It seems I suddenly remembered Jon Favreau's Dinner for Five program, and it seemed strangly appropriate all of a sudden. In this age of prepackaged celebrity junket talk show interviews and publicists trying to control everything that concerns their clients, it is refreshing to see Jon Favreau and four celebrities sitting down to a meal at a nice restaurant(with wine of course) and just conversing about the industry, letting anecdotes bubble up that you would never hear on a regular talk show because they don't have a punchline or the required comedic payoff for that kind of format, but which work perfectly around a table with their peers.

And because the gathered celebrities are generally different types of performers, you sometimes get to see some odd parallels that you wouldn't otherwise be witness to. I can't imagine any other talk show that would put Larry Miller, Peter Bogdanovich, Penelope Ann Miller and Liev Schreiber around the same table and just let them talk it out. I think the closest thing that came to that was Politically Incorrect, but because of the live audience and the fact that issues were artificially introduced by the host, there was still that air of insincerity with Maher's show. There was always a sense of reality when you watched Dinner for Five, like you were getting to observe some rare moments from celebrities with their guard down.

I remember one episode in particular, where Jon Favreau brought together Burt Reynolds, Charles Durning, Dom Deluise and Charles Nelson Reilly and because the four of them know each other so well, it was like watching a well-oiled conversational machine work, and since they are all such veterans of the industry, they all had a lot of insights about Hollywood.

And how could I not love a show that was co-executive produced by little Ralphie from A Christmas Story AKA Peter Billingsley. I am glad to see he is still kicking around behind the camera.

I think the success of this show allowed for the equally intriguing Iconoclasts to be produced, as the specialty cable networks saw that taking the celebrity interview and turning it on its ear could lead to some great television.

I hope that the remaining 3 seasons of Dinner for Five are released on DVD soon, and that Jon Favreau has many more meals on camera in the future.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Friday Favorites: This Game Company practice has got to go!

0 Contributions
Video game related posts have always been popular here at Culture Kills... at least from a writing standpoint (generally they end up being the least commented work I do). But there are times when something I wrote about the industry or a specific title remains relevant even over a long period of time, and this was one of those entries.
--

I have a little pet peeve, and I am sorry some of you have to go along for the ride on this, but it has to be said: PC games that have the CD nag are starting to piss me off.

Now, this doesn't bother me when I know there is stuff on the CD that the game needs to run, like video files or whatever, because usually you have a choice when you install. That's FINE. And I understand having such a restriction on a 50 dollar product when it first comes out to try prevent some forms of theft, even though I don't like it and statistically it probably stops 1-2% of piracy if that.

But when a company is, I don't know, GIVING their games away in a box of cereal or in a magazine or is selling them as part of a larger set for about what the actual disc the game is on would cost to buy as a blank, well then, what is the point of forcing me to stick in a CD to prove that I own it when all the files needed to run it are on my hard drive... really.

I mean, these companies are giving away or selling these games deeply discounted for some future financial gain later because I may want to buy full price games from them after seeing the quality of work they produce, but showing me that you don't trust me with your free or heavily discounted software isn't winning my undying devotion. This is especially true of products that have been patched on the disc, because I know the company spent some time repackaging the product, so why didn't they add that little bit of code to make a full installation no-CD? I mean, I could be a bad boy and go look for help from the industry's sworn enemies, but I don't want to do that. I want the companies that made the games to meet me halfway on this and actually trust me, the consumer, for once.

I know it is merely an inconvenience and not a major issue, but it has always been something that just irked me.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Friday Favorites: Things I miss from childhood

6 Contributions
When I mentioned this article a few days ago when I was writing my post on toys I covet, and I thought it was worth sharing in full again at some point, and well, there seems to be no better moment to do so than now.

--

I was thinking about a few of the things that I miss from childhood or even the recent past and I decided to put together a short list of 15 things that I miss now that I am an adult.

Some of these things are no longer around, some of them I outgrew and some of them are very niche items. Note: Some of these items may be widely available where you live(particularly food items), so take some of these in the spirit in which they are written.


1. 2D Fighting games... 3D has some selling points, but I grew up on River City Ransom, Double Dragon, Street Fighter and Samurai Shodown.

2. Video stations that actually showed music videos. Canadian stations have followed MTV/VH1's example.

3. Tahiti Treat and strawberry flavored sodas. They both remind me of my grandmother.

4. The online soap operas of the 1995-7 era. The Spot, where art thou.

5. Radio programming not determined from a formula. DJ are supposed to be taste makers dammit.

6. New episodes of the recent Disney animated shows(Filmore, Recess, the Weekenders)

6a. The older Disney cartoon series based on their classic properties(Duck Tales, Talespin)

7. Frankenberry Cereal. I still remember the taste.


8. Little green plastic soldiers. I SO outgrew them.

9. Bags of Swedish Fish. I loved them as a kid as penny candies.

10. Puppets and models in movies... I recently watched Close Encounters again, and you know what... that ship still looks pretty damn good. And well done puppetry has an organic warmth to it that will always stay with me.

11. The old funny commercials for FedEx, Wendy's and Alaskan Airlines they used to show in the 1980's... and are largely the basis for Commercial Crazies

12. Good Teen comedies in the theatres. John Hughes, you made an era.

13. The period where Travolta was a punchline and not a leading man.

14. Cajun Spice Ruffles. I didn't appreciate them as much then as I would now. I can take the heat, and I want them back in my kitchen.

15. Action figures that are meant for kids to play with. What is with this keeping crap in the box? Toys are meant to be played with.

So, what do you miss from childhood?

Friday, February 27, 2009

Friday Favorites: Things I'd like to see in a zombie movie

3 Contributions
When I wrote this, I hadn't seen a particular movie which sort of touches upon one of my ideas, so just sort of ignore it.

---
How come no one, when they are out of ammo, tries to bash a zombie's teeth out so they can no longer really bite or kneecap them so they can't walk anymore? Seems like a natural solution to the problem?

How about when zombies eat brains, they actually improve in health(so to speak), or get smarter(because really, that would make as much sense as zombies to begin with).

Or how about having a movie where there is an actual zombie culture and society which is parallel to our own(shopping malls excluded of course)?

4 words: Soylent Green for Zombies

Titles: The Zombie Crusade: The Pope's greatest mistake, Zombie House(with an animatronic John Belushi of course), Zombie Surf Beach, Zombies vs. Pedophiles, Caged Zombie in heat(Fire BAD!), The Zombie Menace eats the Beverly Hills Buffet, Debbie Does Zombies, Saving Zombie Ryan, Zombie vs. Zombie(a touching portrayal of undead divorce, where til Death do you part was only the beginning), Zombies of the Pac-10, It's a zombie, zombie, zombie, zombie world; Young Zombies in Love and of course, Zombie Fight at the OK Graveyard

Friday, February 13, 2009

Friday Favorites: Wacky Packages: Pop Cultural Goodness

3 Contributions
I loved this entry when I wrote it, and I still do. And my love for Wacky Packages has never really abated. And since tomorrow is Valentine's Day, I thought I should go with something I loved.

Well, it makes sense to me at least.

--

Wacky Packages: YicksI was doing a bit of stumblin' around the internet this weekend, and I found a site which brought back a lot of memories for me.

You see, it has been over 20 years since I had a set of Wacky Packages, and in retrospect, I've really missed their irreverent sense of humor. Of course, with the availability of Adobe Photoshop and other graphical packages, well, finding satirical takes on product packaging and advertisements is easier than ever, but there is just something magical about the Wacky Packages series.

Maybe it is the fact that the originals were being produced in the open by a company that was willing to take the risk of litigation to entertain millions of children and adults annually, though granted, the 1970's was probably not as litigious a time as today is, or perhaps it was because at the time I started buying them, there were very few places a child could see material like that... and they are probably one of the reasons I am slightly warped as an adult, but that is ok. And when I read that as recently as 2003 the Morton Salt Company had forced Ebay to restrict auctions of the parody "Moron Salt" sticker, well, that made my love for Wacky Packages grow anew.

They are just pure pop cultural and consumerist goodness. Even if as a kid I didn't get all the references, the artists and conceptualists at Topps didn't dumb things down for us, and in retrospect, I appreciate that. Cleverness is its own virtue after all, and while some of the humor was very low-brow, it did make me ask questions to myself, even if I couldn't yet answer them.

Wacky Packages: Gulp OilThinking back, I got my first set of Wacky Packages back in 1985 was I was about 8 or 9 years old as part of the revival of the product line. (1985 seems to be a seminal year in my development, now doesn't it?), and I had the whole 1985 set and the reprint set of 77 cards in 1986. Of course, I wish I still had them(because I'd be feelthy rich then), but I still got a nice trip down memory lane and some odd product cravings too, mainly for some Hostess Cupcakes, but some other products came up too. And while I was also a fan of the Garbage Pail Kids, the Wacky Packages were always the king of my mid-80's sticker empire, and they were a lot better than anything Mad or Cracked Magazine was coming up with, that's for sure.

Now my question is: was anybody else a fan of these subversively sassy stickers?

Friday, January 30, 2009

Friday Favorites: Maybe CSI:NY should investigate this

3 Contributions
The reason I am reposting this is simple: CSI has a new lead actor after the departure of William Petersen, and the franchise seems to be worth talking about again.

I wrote this entry back in May 2006 (as you will likely notice, most of these entries are from early to mid-2006. I don't know how far in the future some of the things I am writing now are going to become Friday Favorites).

--

I was not an early watcher of CSI, I admit. But there has been something that has been bothering me for a little while now.

It lays mainly in the theme music for the second spinoff of the franchise, CSI: NY. You see, "Baba O'Riley", while being a great song by the Who, has no connection to any kind of crime fighting.

Am I being picky? I would say so. However, let's look at the facts.

The original show has "Who Are You" as its theme, and given the fact that it is about forensic scientists trying to solve crime through DNA and other evidence, it really fits.

Then there is CSI: Miami with "Won't Get Fooled Again" which isn't the most closely tied to the field, but an argument could be made that forensic evidence makes it less likely that the police/CSI's would get fooled by lies and such, so I'll buy it.

And then you have CSI: NY, with a song which has absolutely no connection to CSI whatsoever. Teenage Wasteland indeed.

Considering the fact that you could probably just throw darts at a list of songs by the Who and get a song that you could connect to forensics, it is just, I don't know, bad form on the producers' part.

To test this supposition out, I randomly chose two numbers and applied them to a who compilation I don't own to see if I could accomplish this feat. I chose numbers 3 and 7, then selected 20th Century Masters: The Best Of The Who as the compilation.

What did I end up with? "I Can See for Miles" and "Behind Blue Eyes".

Let's look at "I Can See For Miles" first. Here is the first verse and chorus.

I know you've deceived me, now here's a surprise
I know that you have 'cause there's magic in my eyes

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles
Oh yeah

If you think that I don't know about the little tricks you play
And never see you when deliberately you put things in my way

Well, here's a poke at you
You're gonna choke on it too
You're gonna lose that smile
because all the while

I can see for miles and miles
I can see for miles and miles
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles
Oh yeah


Now, you are telling me that they couldn't have had Gary Sinise looking at a crime scene with UV light and those special glasses, swabbing people and doing all the other CSI type things better to that? I mean, that has a lot more to do with the subject at hand than the current theme.

And then there is "Behind Blue Eyes", which is essentially about crime and conscience, and that isn't good enough for New York? Come on. Did they not even look for another song? If I can do better by random, how hard could it have been to find something when you were really trying?

*grumble* I guess maybe they are saving a song or two for the inevitable CSI: San Francisco or the like.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Friday Favorites: Nothing Short of a Meteor Strike Will Stop It

2 Contributions
I've been listening to a lot of music lately trying to get enough cleared music for a couple of podcasts. I mean a lot. Too much. I'm talking full on overload.

So for this week's Friday Favorite, I thought another music related entry was in order. In this case, it is about a song which will exist long after the human race has finally ceased to exist. Be warned... it is a song you may not want to have brought back into your mind.

--

With all this talk about a wider Middle East war and so many new countries pursuing the dream of nuclear armament ownership (it's like a couple's first house, only most homes don't have a creamy uranium center that will liquefy the insides of millions of people in an instant), I've been wondering what would survive the cataclysmic wars of Armageddon.

Of course, Twinkies, cockroaches and Christmas Fruitcake all come to mind, but perhaps a more sinister survivor will emerge.

And of course I am talking about, the Safety Dance, that oh-so-hummable slice of nostalgic Eigties-ana. Think about it. It survived grunge, it survived hip hop.... it is the terminator of songs... and it won't stop until it has consumed us all. Wil Wheaton wondered how it could get recorded? It was a conspiracy to enslave the human race slowly but surely.

Even Matt Groening thinks it will be in part our undoing. I mean, it survived a millenium into the future on Futurama, for it is our past and it is our future... it will be the anthem of our dark overlords.



So today, we must stop it, so I am calling for everyone to burn any copies of Biodome that you can find. Though really, we should have already been doing that. If we don't do this, than someone in the future is going to have to be sent back to destroy Men Without Hats and they will probably end up killing Duran Duran and Men at Work just to be sure, and we don't want that on our heads either... especially since the alternative is so much worse.

Friday, January 09, 2009

Friday Favorites: My dirty little secret regarding Comedy

0 Contributions
I wrote this entry before the stream of *blank* Movie's really started to pick up steam. I didn't know that there would be so many more of them after Date Movie. I feel sort of prophetic with this August 2006 entry.

--

This is going to be anathema to countless lists of great comedies produced by experts, along with a lot of the comedy lovers out there.

The majority of comedic movies in the Jim Abrahams/Mel Brooks mold just don't appeal to me. I admit it. Ok, that is putting it mildly. I loathe them. I am not saying that their entire portfolio is awful or anything like that. But there is just something about comedy that is trying to make me laugh by introducing an element which is internally inconsistent that irritates me and therefore do not provoke laughter in me.

There are certain qualities I look for in the comedies I watch, no matter how silly or inane. I am willing to accept a lot of things in a movie if it conforms to the internal reality of the story.

I think that is part of the reason that if I ever tried to create a list of what I felt were the best comedies of all-time, I would make a lot of people upset, because movies like Spaceballs, Airplane, Naked Gun and the like would not appear.

Now, to make it clear what kind of comedy I am talking about, I will give an example. In Spaceballs, there is a scene when the hero and his canine buddy "jam" a larger ship's radar.... by firing an actual jar of jam at a radar. I know why it is supposed to be funny, but really, it sort of falls flat for me. Gag humor just doesn't do it for me.

radar jam

There is also a quality in a lot of these movies that in my mind makes them less than timeless. They are very topical in their references, though the jokes they produce are about as cutting as a Jay Leno show monologue joke. They want the lowest common denominator and they sort of want to be offensive in a low grade way. It is like they want to take the easy, safe laugh.

I also know that if Leslie Nielsen is in it, the movie is most likely going to suck to me. For example, when I saw he was in the last two Scary Movies, I knew they were going to be especially terrible to me, and I was right.

Now the argument could be made that I am contradicting myself, as I have in the past professed quite the love for Family Guy and the like, and it has been a well-observed that their bread and butter method of getting a laugh is by introducing some really outlandish element that has nothing to do with the narrative. But the way it happens is in some other scene(chicken-fighting excepted of course). Dreams, visions and the like make a lot of these problems go away as well(the Wayne's World effect if you will).

There is an exception that proves this rule in my mind of course, and in this particular vein of humor, Blazing Saddles still works today and makes me laugh almost every time I see it. Somehow, no matter how weird or stupid the gags get, it just strikes the right chord.

Now I know a lot of you are probably going to disagree with me about this, and that's fine. I would love to discuss this with you all, as it isn't so much a fast and hard rule as it is a predilection. So, if you think I am full of crap or you can think of a movie which is like that and yet you know or think I like based on some of my other entries, well, you can call me on it, because this could be an interesting discussion.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Friday Favorites: Do Video Game-based Movies have to be Terrible?

0 Contributions
Since I've been disclosing my little problem when it comes to being a gaming shopoholic, I thought I would finish up the week with another gaming-related article from August of 2006. The title says it all really.

But because this was written in 2006, there are aspects which now contain factual errors, but I thought in general it was a solid entry all around.

--
With so much bad press coming gaming's way due to congressional attention, Jack Thompson and parent's groups, I began thinking about other problems facing the public perception of video games, and one factor that came to mind was how bad video game-based movies are and why they are as a subgenre lacking, and I came to a few conclusions. See, I think that these kinds of movies encounter a few basic problems:

1) The people who make decisions on what properties to develop make choices based on popularity and not screen potential.. Just because a game is popular doesn't mean it is going to make for a compelling film, as the makers of Super Mario Brothers and Double Dragon can attest to. Of course, many early game-based films can be forgiven for some of their faults because the source material was rather lacking.

2) The producers don't spend the money or the time on the story. In the cases where the story of the game really had potential to dazzle and entertain an audience like Wing Commander, the people responsible for the project tend to really put the story elements on the back burner, and that again leads to a bad movie.

3) The Final Fantasy effect. If the game movie being developed is from source material that is really intricate or complex, well, naturally the filmmakers won't be able to include 1/10th of the storyline and what you end up with is something that is a little superficial and shallow or in short, a pale imitation of the original.

4) Making the assumption that your core audience is gamers. From what I've read, the people who love the games behind these movies are generally hostile to the end product of the Hollywood system. There are movies that did become somewhat successful based on the general movie-going public like Tomb Raider and Resident Evil which both actually reached profitability. Success should be planned on by making a movie that people who have never played the game would want to see. Simple as that.

Now of course, if I ran Hollywood, I would probably give producers and other people developing these movies these simple rules.

1) Choose games that are plot-driven, but not extremely long.
2) Ban Uwe Boll from getting near another game-based movie.
3) Cast your movies well.
4) Spend the money on getting a good script before going further.
5) Make sure people outside of the gaming demographic would want to see it too.

I mean, those do sound like some simple rules to follow, do they not.

Of course, I have a few ideas for what would probably be good movies in the right hands.

Red Dead Revolver: You knew I had to have something from Rockstar on my list, but this probably wasn't the title you were thinking I would pick, but it does have a lot of things going for it. The basis of the game is a story of revenge in the Old West, and because each level was almost like a set piece, with a little clean-up, you'd have the a solid narrative arc. And since there are so many interesting side characters in the game, like Annie Stokes and Jack Swift, it also has some interesting character dynamics. And if the filmmakers also secured the rights to the excellent Ennio Morricone soundtrack, I think this could turn a few heads.

God of War
: This is the game-based movie Vin Diesel should be doing rather than Hitman, because there are very few other actors I could see taking on the role of Kratos. You have a story based around an anti-hero who wants to forget and be forgiven for all the lives he has taken, so he takes on one last quest at the behest of the Gods. It is a bloody, brutal quest, but one which has some meat to it.

And digging way way back into the archives:

I remember playing this game back in the early 1990's called The President in Missing where you are an analyst for the CIA investigating the disappearance of the President of the United States along other European heads of state by digging through source materials and recordings to try to solve the mystery... and as you dug deeper there were some really fascinating twists and turns that would be pure cinema gold.

Now you will notice that while I have professed a deep love for the Grand Theft Auto series, I have not chosen it as an ideal candidate for adaptation, despite its star power and great narrative. And that is because of problem three I mentioned above. As with adapting a Final Fantasy or other long role-playing game, Grand Theft Auto would lose a lot of its loveable character if shoehorned into a two hour movie. However, if say HBO or Showtime decided to make a gritty animated series out of the games, that would probably work out quite well.

So in conclusion, I think the day will come when a video game-based movie will be critically acclaimed and reflect well on the source material. In the meantime however, I am sort of afraid to see what movies like Pacman, Crazy Taxi and Postal are going to do to viewing audiences all over the world when they escape... err, are released.